ARC Forum3
Feedback, Ideas, Experiences and Reports


Home Site:
Male Initiation and the Phimosis Taboos

The Origins of a Taboo

 

ARCindex


disclaimer


ARC Forum3 index

Re: PS Website correction



Written by Robin at 23 Nov 2005 17:41:22:

As an answer to: PS Website correction written by Jim at 20 Nov 2005 17:50:16:

Blimey a mathematician,

I could set you going on Osters statistics if you want a challenge. (it would take several hours work)

I had someone else complain about this 10% a year ago, and I thought Id clarified it - so now clever cloggs how about just telling me how I should phrase it to make everyone happy :):)

"It is often argued that UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) happen 10% more in uncircumcised boys. What does 10% more mean?
Are we talking about 10% more than 1 in 6; or 10% more than 1 in 60,000? What does "10% more" actually mean in terms of how often problems of this sort are occurring?"

I suppose thats my present suggestion and let everyone work out their own fractions and multiplications.

Thanks

Robin

>Your website says:
>"It is often argued that UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) happen 10% more in uncircumcised boys. What does 10% more mean?
>1 in 10 is 10% more than 1 in 100 on the other hand 1 in 6.000 is 10% more than 1 in 60,000. - What does "10% more" actually mean in terms of how often problems of this sort are occurring?"
>Your maths is wrong. 1 in 10 is the same as saying 10 in 100, which is really 900% more than 1 in 100. 10% more than 1 in 100 is 1.1 in 100, or 11 in 1,000. The point your making is still right but you're using the wrong figures to make it.



Answers: