The concept that an anatomical deficiency in the erection can influence the
sexuality appears to contradict every advance in understanding which our culture
has made over the last century. - Psychological research has concentrated on parental
and environmental phenomenon, and the urological disciplines do not
include sexual behaviour. Scientific research has overlooked this area
of human sexuality.
THE LATE INITIATE
It never ceases to astound and confuse people that I (and numerous
other men) have taken till adulthood and even fairly late in adulthood
to discover such a rudimentary ailment and inadequacy in his external
First, to answer the implication "weren`t you rather stupid?"
well yes!, - but I feel this question may also cause some embarrassment
among the doctors who have examined me over the years, the authors
of the sexual advice books which I read, and the therapists and even
experts in sexual research who I have consulted.
It often takes a long time for people to discover things about
themselves, and this happens with lots of people in lots of different
walks of life (even when there is adequate available information).
Questions and doubts apparently occur with this subject because men
are notoriously rumoured to be worried about their penis and every
person on the street has understood that sexual problems are inevitably
the result of early upbringing, parents and a resultant psychological
Any anatomical problems of the penis are generally understood to
be illusory. Even the unbiased listener if they understand that men
do indeed have anatomical complaints, they reason with accepted modern
awareness that some sort of psychological imbalance must have been
the primary influence which allowed the anatomical disposition to become
a problem. - This is not the case.
It is necessary to correct these misunderstandings, and analyse
and describe this aspect of human nature.