[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by HW at 09 Jan 2002 17:51:31: Re: Tight something.
As an answer to: Re: Tight something. written by LG at 16 Dec 2001 17:24:43:
>>>If anyone has something constructive to add please do.
>>Mmmmm.
>
>Thanks for all the input...the second pic is probably the best visual with the exception of the head doesnt bend down from the tightness..the doc..a she..said that the horizontal slit will let the circumference of the 4skin ease up a bit allowing the 4skin to slide all the way back...mine has never retracted on its own when getting an erection and this is supposed to hel that. She did say also that....this might not work as well as needed and that i should be prepared for it so she seemed well versed on the procedure and seemed to cover all the bases should this not work. Once again..Thank You for all the input!!!!
>LGIsay go for it, especially if you wish to avoid a regular circ. Most Dr's are tunnel vision on this with only one answer. Whereas a not too tight circ is not as bad a fate as the raving intacters would imply, choose what you are comfortable with.
I will explain why I think this procedure would work.
At puberty I was able to train my foreskin to remain retracted. As I approached middle age the foreskin would occassionally roll forward of its own volition if I would squat, etc. Prior to that time it was truly convertible and would maintain either position almost indefinitely, except that an erection would automatically expose it, bute would mot cover unless moved forward manually. I removed a 1/2 x 1 1/2 strip tapering to the edges of skin from near the end of the foreskin, top only.
This created a default to exposed glans, although the glans can be covered when not erect. Appearancewise this is similar to a picture on circlist of "an unusual circumcision" in which there is some extra skin on the lower side. Circ-list quoted the possesor of that penis as saying it was performed by some Dr in infancy, and that the extra skin was a source of great pleasure when he or his wife would "play" with it. I concur heartily with that!The removal of skin or a slit would reduce the effect of a tight or short frenulum.
In my case the benefits include great sensations at the upper back edge of the corona from the corona being somewhat expanded and accessible to vaginal or hand stimulation, and easy stimulation at the bottom side also. Orgasmic nerve triggers in Homo sapiens are concentrated near the coronal edge. In apes they are closer to the tip (and orgasm isin 15 seconds for them). I am a thorough believer in the benefits of exposing the glans after puberty- it thrives on it.
Hope this doesn't confuse your decision. I'm sure alesser skin opening couldcure your problem. Wish more MD's would provide more options.