[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by AJ at 22 Jul 2003 15:30:57: Chimp...
As an answer to: Re: IP Address written by chImp at 22 Jul 2003 14:28:19:
>However, there are two things I want from you:
There are things I want from you too, Chimp. So by answering the following I hope that you do me the same favour by showing some restraint from time to time.
>1) You still haven't in any way commented my AJ's paradox
The reason I did not comment on this was because you tend to speculate a lot (just as Jim does). However, unlike Jim, you are prepared to accept that your speculations are sometimes wrong. Whatever, here my comments on your theories:
1) Curing phimosis by stretching is fully POSSIBLE (proven by me and Jake Booth) and there is no reason why AJ's penis should be in any way different than mine/Jake Booths
Stretching the foreskin works in some cases and not others.
2) AJ found out he has phimosis and that the cure is circumcision
Stretching did not work for me. So circumcision was an option.
3) Clearly, AJ didn't WANT a circumcision, why else would he search all over the Internet to discover that it's POSSIBLE to cure it with simple stretching exercises. Also, he tried to minimize the "damage" by getting a "partial" circ.
I never had the motivation to be circumcised. I did, however, want a penis that would allow normal functioning without the burden of pain and insensitivity due to no retraction.
4) Point 3 leads to believe that AJ concideres/concidered circumcision as a bad alternative, and labelling him as a proCIRC-fetishist is wrong.
Labelling me as pro-circ fetishist is indeed wrong.
5) Point 3 also leads to the conclusion that being an intact male WITHOUT phimosis was the most DESIRED result for AJ.
Since I had no motivation to be circumcised other than having a penis that would allow normal functioning without the burden of pain and insensitivity due to non retraction, that would reasonable to conclude to draw - I would not wish phimosis on anyone.
6) Point 5 and 1 lead to the conclusion that AJ missed this desired result while being perfectly able to achieve it.
Stretching works in some cases and not all.
7) Basically, AJ screwed up and he knows it!
I didn't screw up in the slightest, Chimp. I tried stretching for several months. While stretching can be good for some people, it doesn't work for all. Also, you speculate by saying "AJ screwed up and he knows it". That is a very Jim-like statement. I am quite happy and did not make a mistake.
>2) I want you to categorically deny that your name is Adam James.
Why? The speculation over my name was started by Jim. For some reason he and at least one of his cohorts (27/F - as she was known at the time) wanted to know my real name. They would make wild guesses such as Arthur James, Adam James, etc. over at fathermag (it was also during this time that Jim speculated about what I do for a living.) This obsession led me to create an e-mail address with the name AdamJames in the address. I then went on to indicate that I post on alt.circumcision and they tracked down my "name" from there. They then began to call me Adam James with frequency until I pointed out the flaw in their obsessive hunt. Prior to this though they had tracked down a guy called Adam James on the internet and posted (as AJ) his address and details on this forum and asked people to phone this guys work and complain about him (how screwed up is that!!!) Thankfully my cyber-stalkers were off the mark and merely demonstrated their screwed up natures. They never said why they were so interested in my name and what I do for a living.
To make it clear: I am not Adam James. It was merely a made up name that was created to demonstrate how Jim and co. were cyber-stalking me. It paid off by demonstrating just that.
Thanks.
- Re: Chimp... Jim 7/22/2003 17:29 (16)
- Re: Chimp... AJ 7/22/2003 18:11 (15)
- Re: Chimp... Jim 7/22/2003 18:21 (13)
- Re: Chimp... Ralesk 7/23/2003 13:20 (0)
- Re: Chimp... AJ 7/22/2003 18:34 (11)
- Now read this carefully Jim 7/22/2003 19:19 (10)
- Re: Now read this carefully Ralesk 7/23/2003 13:26 (5)
- Re: Now read this carefully Jim 7/25/2003 20:32 (4)
- Not all, Jim... AJ 7/25/2003 20:53 (3)
- Get your head out of the clouds Jim 7/25/2003 23:22 (0)
- The Godfather part IV chImp 7/25/2003 23:21 (1)
- Re: The Godfather part IV 29/F 7/26/2003 04:35 (0)
- Re: Now read this carefully Jim 7/22/2003 22:03 (2)
- Lol... AJ 7/22/2003 23:34 (1)
- Aussie girl is right about you Jim 7/23/2003 00:29 (0)
- Jim... AJ 7/22/2003 19:29 (0)
- Re: Chimp... 29/F 7/22/2003 18:20 (0)
- Re: Chimp... 29/F 7/22/2003 16:44 (15)
- Really? AJ 7/22/2003 17:27 (14)
- Re: Really? 29/F 7/22/2003 18:16 (8)
- Adam James... AJ 7/22/2003 18:47 (7)
- Re: Adam James... 29/F 7/22/2003 18:54 (6)
- Re: Adam James... AJ 7/22/2003 18:58 (5)
- Re: Adam James... 29/F 7/22/2003 19:01 (4)
- Re: Adam James... Ralesk 7/23/2003 13:13 (2)
- Re: Adam James... 29/F 7/23/2003 19:11 (0)
- Re: Adam James... Jim 7/23/2003 16:32 (0)
- Re: Adam James... Jim 7/22/2003 19:06 (0)
- Re: Really? Jim 7/22/2003 17:31 (4)
- My Mother? AJ 7/22/2003 18:07 (3)
- Re: My Mother? Jim 7/22/2003 18:11 (2)
- London? AJ 7/22/2003 18:35 (1)
- Re: London? Jim 7/22/2003 19:08 (0)