[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Adam James...

Written by Ralesk at 23 Jul 2003 13:13:59:

As an answer to: Re: Adam James... written by 29/F at 22 Jul 2003 19:01:07:

>Sigh. AJ/... you don't get it. So it's pointless to continue with you. Other people will get it though. Thanks for playing.
>>I did not use Adam James. Ever. That was the bait, and you took it.

What if he /is/ Adam, but /is not/ Adam JAMES? Let alone that particular Adam James we thought him to be? He may or may not be that guy.

PS: it would be more logical to compare the timestamps of AJ starting to use the "bait" address and the post on alt.circumcision and the start of you guys addressing him as A-something James. Getting to know that chronology makes more sense than getting to know the chronology of him coming to fathermag and to this site.


Answers: