[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by H 77 at 06 Aug 2003 03:39:44: Re: Fresh start...
As an answer to: Fresh start... written by AJ at 02 Aug 2003 11:51:30:
When I returned to viewing this forum maybe a year ago I was shocked at what it had become compared to what it was about 3 yrs ago. Anyone with any views to present that did't match 100% with those of a handful of persons that *insist* on being intact being the *only* way to go would get a real bashing.
While it is somewhat to be expected that as the forum deals largely with forskin problems (original forum intent was to help "male Initiation) one would expect that those that are intact would have some very good advice.
However if anyone would suggest seeing a doctor there would generally be comments that go beyond advising that advise absolutely to stay away from Doctors.It is a bit like if your car is burning oil and needs an overhaul, ring job and all and we have these guys talk you into using an oil additive or mouse milk. You may get temporary relief and eventually have to bite the bullet and get the overhaul.
Many who have had a circumcision as an adult will say that it cured problems and had no adverse or perhaps even had beneficial effects on their sex life.
Those who buy into a big sensitivity difference are correct if you are thinking of a never exposed glans meeting air the first time compared to what
an adult often exposed or always exposed glans would be like.Of course if these type statements reach someone circed as a child and not knowing the whole score they may well touch the glans and say "My sensitivity is gone!" Obviously forgetting that sexually useful sensitivity is there when some desirable type manipulation brings it- hey if it was always "sensitive" you couldn't get any work done.
Anyway I wish there could be more tolerance in accepting other things that work! The original intent of the forum was to help Male Initiation- not to bash anyone that doesn't go along with "intact at all costs".
>Rood, as you have said Chimp, is the head of NORM Phoenix. If this is not bias enough, then it should be considered that Rood believes that individuals that are circumcised as adults are fetishists. Not very impartial, no?