[ ARC forum 2 ]

Latest

Written by 41M at 18 Aug 2003 14:09:57:

Interesting developments. Can I pass comment....
a) Generally pleased to see no-trolling and no sixth-form debates about
Creationism (whatever) etc. I am however uncertain as to what the criteria
for moderator selection was.
b) With Jim being banned (that had a certain inevitability), will Paul B walk
off in sympathy? Those two seemed hand-in-glove.
c) It was intimated on several occasions that Paul B is a doctor. Where did
this come from? He loves italics, but that doesn't make his writings clear
or brief. I just think a note of caution is needed here - some hospitals have
egocentrics masquerading as bogus doctors, and I suspect a forum is the
easiest place for this to occur. Can Paul prove anything in terms of qualifications? If Jim were allowed, he'd say: "Don't you worry yourself, son,
he's A1 doctor material..." But Jim isn't allowed, not even as Larry from
Oklahoma (Jesus, what a sacry nom-de-plume).
d) I'm personally keen to hear from phimotics who have had success with
dorsal slits, preputioplasty etc. Or no success as the case may be.
e) Final point: the purpose of eliminating foreskin problems is to wash
easily and have comfortable sex. Period. I noticed a while ago that chImp
had stretched successfully but hadn't had sex yet. Why not? Yet AJ, I think
was 'tested in the field' - does that mean partial circ. is operationally
more successful than stretching?


Answers: