[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ralesk at 18 Aug 2003 20:46:22: Re: Latest
As an answer to: Latest written by 41M at 18 Aug 2003 14:09:57:
>Interesting developments. Can I pass comment....
>a) Generally pleased to see no-trolling and no sixth-form debates about
>Creationism (whatever) etc. I am however uncertain as to what the criteria
>for moderator selection was.
Point.
>b) With Jim being banned (that had a certain inevitability), will Paul B walk
>off in sympathy? Those two seemed hand-in-glove.
Hell knows.>c) It was intimated on several occasions that Paul B is a doctor. Where did
>this come from? He loves italics, but that doesn't make his writings clear
>or brief. I just think a note of caution is needed here - some hospitals have
>egocentrics masquerading as bogus doctors, and I suspect a forum is the
>easiest place for this to occur. Can Paul prove anything in terms of qualifications?
>If Jim were allowed, he'd say: "Don't you worry yourself, son,
>he's A1 doctor material..." But Jim isn't allowed, not even as Larry from
>Oklahoma (Jesus, what a sacry nom-de-plume).
Now really, does it matter? He's just like any other forum dweller, it's simply that he knows a lot about medicine. Now, why are we not intimidated by all the other posters on this forum who don't have any qualification gossip hovering above their heads? What makes them more qualified to give advice? Simple as that, Paul has never in my experience claimed either that he was or that he wasn't a doctor. I don't know why people keel acting like gossiping old ladies and keep obsessing about Paul B. Just accept him like you accept any random forum poster.>d) I'm personally keen to hear from phimotics who have had success with
>dorsal slits, preputioplasty etc. Or no success as the case may be.>e) Final point: the purpose of eliminating foreskin problems is to wash
>easily and have comfortable sex. Period. I noticed a while ago that chImp
>had stretched successfully but hadn't had sex yet. Why not? Yet AJ, I think
>was 'tested in the field' - does that mean partial circ. is operationally
>more successful than stretching?
Perhaps the fact chImp is underage? And we don't know anything about AJ's exposure (no pun intended) to partners and sex, as it's too much of a personal matter for him than to reveal.
So you have come to a conclusion that's worth nothing.--
R.