[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ivan at 01 Oct 2003 14:38:57: Don't buy this bill of goods
As an answer to: Re: sex with foreskin written by anonymous at 01 Oct 2003 09:25:08:
>I have a long foreskin with 1 to 2 cm overhang when flaccid but no overhang when erect. No phimosis or tight frenulum. In my experience I can say that intercourse with a completely covered glans is possible. I must apply a lubricant from the base of my penis to the tip of the foreskin but I don’t lubricate the glans and the inner side of the foreskin. I also must use lubricant on the vulva of my partner, particularly in the vagina opening and on the both sides of each inner labia.
Most of what has been said here betrys a total ignorance of sexual mechanics and experience.
>Then I can push very slowly my covered glans in the vagina opening. I stop the movement if I feel my foreskin is pushed back.
And sort of pressure around the penis is going to cause the foreskin to be pushed back. Unless you have significant phimosis, it's impossible to puh into even a very loose vagina without the foreskin rolling back.> When my penis is entirely in the vagina, I begin to move with little strokes then bigger and bigger strokes.
>Advantage for me : absolutely nothing ! Orgasm is almost impossible, I have no sensations, except a contact with the cervix on the tip of my foreskin.
Baloney again, the glans will roll within the foreskin and out of it to contact and rub through the vagina and there will be lots of sensation, especially if making the 'bigger and bigger' strokes claimed here.> But I had experimented that on dozens of partners and I can say that contact between the tip of the foreskin and the cervix can cause several violent orgasms.
"dozens of partners - hah! Female orgasm because their cervix is contacted - hah! both are complete fabrications> Finally, I retract my foreskin by pulling the skin of my scrotum then I ejaculate after few strokes.The best results are obtained if I stretch the tip of my foreskin to the maximum forward before I apply the lubricant.
The obvious rantings of someone trying to make 'evidence' that only the glans provides any sexual sensation for men. The real goal of his post is to make it seem that there is no stimulation if the glans is not exposed. Do not buy this malarkey!