[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: These men want their foreskins back

Written by Harmen at 13 Oct 2003 22:40:35:

As an answer to: These men want their foreskins back written by USA at 11 Oct 2003 22:03:44:

>>Those opposed to circumcision insist the extra skin makes a big difference, but a recent study by urologists found little difference in sensitivity in the penises of circumcised and uncircumcised men.

Indeed, that’s my experience too and I possess a real foreskin. Like it or not, but I like ‘skinning back’. Most of the time (over 90%), during more than 20 years now, my glans is naked and it feels good. A little less sensation than before, but not much difference. It’s the opposite of their problem, though ‘problem’ isn’t the right word for me.

>>Nonetheless, restorers speak with quiet joy about their new foreskins. They describe heightened sexual sensation — increased sensitivity for a man, less friction for his partner. They insist that the newly covered glans can become more sensitive.

I think that’s nonsense. May be they feel what they want to feel, but the most pleasant feelings come from the foreskin itself and the nerves under the frenulum. I don’t envy them for missing their foreskin in spite of my skinning back. I could easily turn back to a covered glans but it won’t happen I think. I don’t want to spoil their pleasure, but many doubts are remaining.

Harmen



Answers: