[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by 41m at 05 Nov 2003 22:15:42: Re: Gary 27/10 Preputioplasty
As an answer to: Re: Gary 27/10 Preputioplasty written by Gary at 03 Nov 2003 19:37:03:
>1) No tissue has been lost.
>2) Doctor was a consultant urologist + surgeon. (Like all specialists, he wasn't the most talkative and pleasant, but was confident in what he was doing. Prepuceplasties are apparently very common and very simple to perform. ALL such specialists are trained to do this proceedure)
**Gary, fabulous to hear from you. Can you give his name and the hospital
he operates from? The fact that you are happy is a great recommendation.
May I enquire whether sex is any different (better) for you now?
Best Regards, 41m **
>3) Appearance wise, when flaccid looks exactly the same. when I start to roll foreskin back, it is a bit different. There is now like a V shape or U shape when rolling back, as a result of the prepuceplasty. Hard to explain, but not really anything major. As I previously said, when erect, foreskin doesn't quite slide back as I would like - although it is now at least possible (previously I could only manage to slide it back half way and v. painful - now it is only painful if I ejaculate when skin is pulled back)
>4) can't help you with the exposure thing as my foreskin had always been able to slide back comfortably when flaccid, only impossible when erect - therefore glans has had a lot of exposure.
>very slight discomfort after the op, but NO pain. Couldn't slide foreskin back for a few days cos foreskin was a bit swollen, but returned to normal after a couple of weeks.
>get back to me.