[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: 30 years too late

Written by AJ ARCModerator at 21 Jun 2004 20:43:59:

As an answer to: Re: 30 years too late written by David_R at 21 Jun 2004 19:03:57:

>Indeed, that was the type of anti-circ vitriol that typifies respondents to this forum. Why they get so nasty over something as inconsequential as a foreskin, only the Lord knows! The bitterest outbursts comes from these guys: you almost never see such invective from the happily circ'd chaps. I am working on a theory about the presence of a foreskin and the response of the pineal gland. There has to be a link... there MUST be!

David R, this isn't fathermag. There will be no bitching and infighting here. Period. I appreciate your input here, but please don't go down the same route that the majority of your fellow fathermag contributors do with their nonsense and bickering among themselves and with other contributors that don't share their views. Offering advice and help is what this forum is about.

Thanks.




Answers: