[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by David_R at 16 Sep 2004 23:14:34: Re: HELP
As an answer to: Re: HELP written by Ivan at 13 Sep 2004 13:20:38:
>
>These claims of yours are simply nonsense. There is ample documentation and millions of years experience showing that the foreskin is an important functional part of the penis in sexual activity. The circumcised penis may be capable of allowing reproduction, but that is not the same as being the complete package required. I notice that you only mention penile pleasure. On the one hand, that is absurd because you are eliminating a very large proportion of the sexual nerve endings of the penis. On the other hand, you have no regard for vaginal pleasure: that's probably fine for you, but for men who enjoy sharing pleasure with women, the fact that the intact penis is far superior, as confirmed by the vast majority of women in a position to make a fair comparison, is a very important consideration.These are no more claims than yours and better researched I might add. Your disparaging comments about my 'sense' of vaginal intercourse is ill-founded and inappropriate. The foreskin, mate, is less useful than the appendix and ear hair- both of which come with the native package.
- Peace on Earth... AJ 9/17/2004 00:13 (0)