[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: "how to fix phimosis and tight forskin" -- This forum is BIASED

Written by Ivan at 14 Feb 2005 05:44:28:

As an answer to: "how to fix phimosis and tight forskin" -- This forum is BIASED written by Atherton at 14 Feb 2005 01:48:51:

>The moderator to this forum deletes any posts that suggest a circumsition or any other procedure. Hence, making all the threads exremly anti-circ. This is encouraging steching (which is good) but sometimes this procedure is needed, and other times it is not. Either way, Men are entitled to knowing what options they have, and this is taking away our right to freedom of speech.
>LINK TO FORUM> http://www.network54.com/Forum/244184
>Check it out for yourselves and lemme know what you think.
>Who's with me?
>Atherton
I think that you're ... well, if I really said it the Moderator would probably edit or delete it, and this time he would probably be right. This site has become so insanely circ-friendly that I have been sorely tempted to just give up on it. Less than .01% of men will ever need circumcision for therapeutic reasons. The vast majority of phimotics (who only constitute about 1% in the first place) could cure their situation without getting mutilated. The grotesque enthusiasm for sircumcision expressed by the substantlial majority of men posting on this site evidences to me that their interest has nothing ton do with health or function and everything to do with a rabid desire to ogle their glanses all day long, or maybe not just their own. The body was made beautiful and remarkably functional in subtle ways that we are just beginning to fully appreciate, and the efforts of circumcision enthusiasts are as sensible as those of the fellow that took a sledge hammer to the privates of Michaelangelo's David a few years ago.

To the best of my knowledge, I am the only regular poster who could be called anti-circ, and even I don't so much care whether someone chooses it himself. I just hate to see people get themselves mutilated on the basis of the misrepresentations of the circumcision fetishists. For the life of me, I do not see how you could possibly call this site anti-circ. I shudder to think at what sort of site you would consider to be 'balanced' but I know that I am certainly not going to waste my time finding out.

I do hope I have not been too subtle - but I think I may have actually controlled my outrage at your BS sufficiently to keep the Mod from deleting it.

P.S. - Moderator, Have you actually deleted any pro-circ posts on any grounds other than either being personally abusive or essentially pornographic?


Answers: