[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ivan at 16 Jun 2005 04:37:51: Re: About operation
As an answer to: About operation written by Sergio at 15 Jun 2005 18:43:26:
>Hi.
>I Had an appointment with the Urologist today, I was considering to perform a Frenuloplasty (since I realized I had frenulum breve without phimosis) but when I told him, he saids that he'd better perform a FRENULOPLASTY WITH CIRCUMCISION. He argues that only making frenuloplasty without circumcision, can bring latter problems in some years, and that my foreskin probably wouldn't be able to fully retract, but at the end of the appointment, he says: "Think about it, but if you want, I'll perform only the frenuloplasty.".
>My problem is that I have to take the decision today, and I really don't want circumcision.
>The question: Can frenuloplasty alone solve the problem I described (when erection, I retract my foreskin without pain but if I let it go, it springs foreward), or I am obligated to endure the two procedures???
>I apreciate your answers.
Yuo don't need ANY operation. Your foreskin and frenulum are doing exactly what they are supposed to do. When you have intercourse, the foreskin will slide comfortably back while the glans (head) is in the vagina, and then as you withdraw it will spring back to keep all the moisture where it belongs toallow maximum whoopee. You've got it all, man, don't let some nutso tell you otherwise.