[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Paul B. at 08 Feb 2002 12:20:39: Partial Phimosis
As an answer to: Re: Partial Phimosis written by Emilio R. at 06 Feb 2002 13:57:45:
> if you masterbate yourself frequently, the smegma ... works its way to the tip and leaves when you pee,
I do tend to agree. I think that masturbation undoubtedly serves as part of the cleaning process, literally "shaking loose" the smegma so that it can be flushed out forthwith by the urine. And even more effective is intercourse.
And have you noticed how masturbation or sex of whatever sort, gives your kidneys a "hurry up" so you have to pee soon afterwards?
> so making the skin go back to wash isn't as necessary as it seems.
Perhaps not; a particular danger is the temptation to use soap under the foreskin. I tend to say that if you use soap and "get away with it", that's fine, but anyone who has any problem with irritation under the foreskin, should definitely avoid using soap on it. Same advice, incidentally, applies as much or more to women!
However, I think that the normal expectation is that the foreskin should retract easily, and that doing this for peeing from an early age is a preferred habit to make sure it does.
> When you place the penis to enter the girl, the sheath pushes back if it can.
And, goes forward again as you pull out, if she is not so slippery inside.
> When I married, my father explained ... after you make sex to bring forward the sheath immediately or often it becomes captured by the head.
A most interesting concept.
> If the opening ... doesn't permit that it uncovers the head and there is some pain then it is simple,
> you use a little oil for sex to help it slide in.In other word, you use a lubricant and let the penis slide in and out completely without the foreskin coming back at all.
This is of great interest, since there are some people with the peculiar notion that if the foreskin cannot come back, you cannot enjoy intercourse, or have an orgasm ("come") or father children. Your explanation of your brother and friend's experiences point out that such an idea is absolutely absurd!
> It doesn't seem these things are difficult.
Some people enjoy making things (appear) difficult.
> If the movement of the sheath was so important, than it seems the almighty would make a muscle there to accomplish this action, no?
But He obviously already has! It is the muscle inside, or around the woman's vagina, and that's exactly what it does!
(Or failing that, in your hand!) (;-)