[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Shame on you...

Written by rjk at 25 Feb 2002 18:56:04:

As an answer to: Shame on you... written by AJ at 15 Feb 2002 18:01:02:

>I can only speak from the standards that we hold in my country, the UK. We do not accept parents getting off sexually from the children, or vica-versa. I'm pretty sure that most other places in the world do not either.

I fully agree. Certainly not in the USA, not even California, where (contrary to some opinions held elsewhere) most people are quite level-headed! A father who regularly handles his son's genitals has got to be pretty sick and, more, to be setting his son up for problems of his own later in life.

>PaulB and Jim: You have both literally implied that I am going to hell due to the fact I do not pescribe to your belief system as far as circumcisions go. I'm sorry you feel that way. Thankfully though, even though you may be far-right Christian, it does not really mean anything and the "prohpetical" warning from PaulB, does not influence me either. Thanks anyway. You have both been childish and downright rude at times not just to me but to anyone that doesn't share you perspectitve. I certainly hope that in future you might excersize some of that common sense that you think you are so full of and show some restraint when supporting people like who started this thread who obviously either are child abusers or some punks having a laugh.
>As for my contribution to this and the fathermag (the anti-circ board): I have recieved many thanks for my advice on these forums. It is unfortunate that there are so many back-slappers egging each other on, giving advice of which they absolutely no perspective and are extremely poorly educated on(take for example: Jim and Aussie Girl over at Fathermag).

The Spaniards have a proverb that often comes to mind: 'In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king' or, if you prefer, 'En el pais de los ciegos, el tuerto es rey'.

>Oh, as for PaulB being a "Quack" - something you often accuse me of calling him: I'd like to say I have never called him a "Quack". Indeed for me to do so would indicate that I believe he is indeed a Doctor, which I do not.

Nor do I; there's a lot to indicate he/(she?) isn't. A more likely possibility is a p.a. (physician's assistant) who may have attended a school of nursing, but no well-grounded physician would likely make some of the allegations that have appeared under his/(her?) name.

>Thanks


Answers: