[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Jim at 05 Mar 2002 05:53:02: Re: Failure vs Success
As an answer to: Re: Failure vs Success written by AJ at 04 Mar 2002 21:16:38:
>Jim, quite often you make the comparison between foreskins stretching and people that are overweight. Prior to this you used you stated that if skin didn't stretch then we wouldn't be able to grow (something along those lines). Anyway, I put you right on the latter and pointed out that the we are not born with such an excess of skin as when we are born we do not look like bassett hounds, and also that the skin grows. Your new comparison coupled with your other "surgeons use it" are not entirely accurate in this context. For example - When women get pregnant the skin stretches/grows and then reverts to it's normal state once the stretching has stopped (baby is born).
>Stretching is not as fallable as you have been led to believe, Jim.
>Thanks for your inputI love it when you trap yourself. You just gave a brilliant example of skin stretching without realizing it would boomerang.
As a man stretches his foreskin, it will indeed begin to accommodate the glans and allow retraction. With continued stretching for a few more weeks to ensure that skin cells have filled in, AND with continued use of the retracting feature by regular use, he will have permanently cured himself. This is possible EVEN with scars. The pregnant lady, once having delivered the baby, is no longer practicing stretching. Many women who have gained a considerable amount, however, have a difficult time returning to their original form. Some never do, although the weight may be gone. They have, in effect, permanently stretched their bodies. I know, because I have a perfect living model to look at in my home. In the case of the tight foreskin having been stretched, as it is regularly retracted, it will continue to accommodate the glans because it is being held at tension.
I have also witnessed another stretching example of a young man at the gym who was morbidly obese. He underwent gastric bypass surgery and has shed what appears to be a ton of weight. However, his body is highly challenged to revert back to normalcy. He also has stretched his skin over the years.
Recently I suffered a pretty nasty cut on a thumb right at a knuckle. Because of the constant use of the thumb it has been slower healing than a normal cut, but amazingly, the skin, including the scar, is flexible as ever. My thumbs are able to bend in either direction, and there has been no loss of flexibility in either direction. So much for for the argument of scars not stretching.
AJ, you have a lot to learn. Why not sit back and observe for a while. Paul and I are here to help these young men solve their problems and solve them permanently. It is our intention that they enjoy their sexual experiences to the highest degree, rather than at a lower degree. The male anatomy was designed to function at its best with all of its original equipment. Why alter what is perfectly designed. I think of the original 55 T-bird or the 65 Mustang and how Ford butchered those designs in such a way that the cars were no longer recognizable or functional in their originally intended manner. That's exactly what happens when we operate on our bodies. In the absence of disease or trauma, there is no valid reason for taking a knife to our bodies. Is that making sense?