[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ralesk at 05 May 2002 05:07:23: Re: Phimosis and no ejeculation
As an answer to: Re: Phimosis and no ejeculation written by AJ at 04 May 2002 12:44:39:
» a specialist who will be qualified to accurately diagnos what the problem is and
» will also be able to tell you what the solutions are.The problem is that he knows what the problem is, anyway. Assuming he lives in either the USA or in other place that has a high circ rate, the only solution he'll get from a specialist, is that he would get cut in no time.
You believe blindly in papers [= qualification], why? Have you not seen people who have paper about something yet don't know sh*t about it?
Ok, the doctor or the specialist knows most probably a lot more things about the human body than I do. Yet, how much do you suppose an USAmerican doctor knows about the penis? Not more than his textbooks taught him -- unless he's one of the rare ones who is either uncut, or someone who reads up things and is updated --, which means, that he would believe the penis is good sans foreskin, the foreskin shouldn't actually be there, who the hell left that guy intact?» Please be careful, a lot of people online will give you a lot of advice, but
» they aren't qualified and most don't even have any experience in what they suggest.My advice to you, AJ is to stop using these awfully biased scare tactics. "To speak water and drink wine", says the saying, and it is perfectly true on you. Shameful. On the other hand, where do *you* have any experience here? Hmm?
- Re: Phimosis and no ejeculation AJ 5/05/2002 14:47 (1)
- Re: Phimosis and no ejeculation Ralesk 5/05/2002 15:31 (0)