[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Jim at 28 May 2002 14:43:54: Re: another tight forskin question
As an answer to: another tight forskin question written by jim at 28 May 2002 06:26:55:
Your several post seem to contradict each other. In the first you indicate that you wish to avoid surgery, and later you seem to be wanting to know more about it? Which is it?
You've asked about the cost. Dollars are not the prime consideration for such a procedure. The real cost, as Rood has already pointed out, is the loss of sensitivity. Real live and documented tests done as a study by a Univ of Sydney researcher prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that there is a definite difference between the intact and the mutilated in the quality and quantity of sensation felt by just the glans. Beyond what is felt by the glans is the intense gratification which is felt by the inner foreskin and the frenar band as it glides back and forth over the head. That is irreplaceable after mutilation. Is this a price you are willing to pay?
>Alright guys, ive been doing a lot of reading but i still have a question.
>My forskin is really really tight. There is only a hole big enough to pee thru when soft and erect.
>Im going to go talk to my doctor, and try the betamethasone .05% cream.
>Has anyone had success with this cream when the forskin was really tight, or is this cream generally more successful when there is atleast some sort of looseness in the forskin?
>I really really dont want to have surgury, but im worried the cream wont work because im so tight right now.
>Thanks guys