[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Jim at 01 Jun 2002 21:35:53: Re: Rare combination?
As an answer to: Re: Rare combination? written by Ralesk at 01 Jun 2002 19:18:44:
Any scar tissue which would prevent stretching would have to be quite severe in order to do so. This has been discussed at length and proven beyond doubt. What we are seeing here is simply an immature attempt at discredidation. Thanks for your support, but I think it's pretty clear with the evidence provided by all of the reports we're getting that the advice is working and that stretching does indeed work when diligently employed.
>>I'm only stating that which even your pal Jim knows: "stretching is always successful in the absence of severe scarring"
>>Source: messages1/1738.htm
>That sentence does not provide information about the case when scar tissue is present. It only states that in case scar tissue is absent, stretching always works.
>And while you are using this sentence of Jim, and using it as evidence in many posts you make here, how do you relate it with your theory that stretching doesn't work for everyone (in the context that it didn't work for you). I don't remember you stating you had scar tissue (before your loose circumcision). Therefore, if you use Jim's statement in the sense you use it, it contradicts your own statements about how stretching doesn't work for everyone (including you, I emphasise)
>:]