[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: question

Written by AJ at 29 Jun 2002 19:26:51:

As an answer to: Re: question written by Ralesk at 29 Jun 2002 16:08:07:

Ralesk,

I'll try and pick up with you on the comments you have made here. However, if it dissolves into a bs thread from your peers then we can carry it on via e-mail if you wish too.

>if you are so much anti-stretching, CBAD should be the order, I think. Starting with the least invasive.

I appreciate what you are saying here. However, the listing is in no particular order. Perhaps by adding a bracketed disclaimer: (in no particular order). Would this help satisfy you?

>Could we live without badmouthing each other, sir?

It's not my intention to badmouth you, Ralesk. If you can point out to me where offense was taken I'll try and address.

>I'd like you to stop this scaremongering about the stretching in general.

I don't consider it as scaremongering. I'm not trying to scare people out of attempting stretching. I will not, however, appreciate the perspective of those that think it is a given and allow them to state only their context is applicable. I merely suggest that the individual concerned take medical advice prior to doing it (especially for the 35mm thing). I rarely make reference to the less desirable effects of stretching I have read/seen, hence I don't consider it scare mongering.

How's that?

Thanks.


Answers: