[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Phillip at 30 Jul 2002 00:07:01: What he meant was horse's ass
As an answer to: From the horses mouth... written by AJ at 27 Jul 2002 13:34:00:
>>Which one of you is right, most docters recommend circumsison, are they all wrong.
>Circumcision is not always neccessary, but is considered by virtually every medical body in the developed world that it is the most common and best way to resolve phimosis and related conditions. There are several alternatives to full circumcision depending on the disorder - partial-circumcision, dorsal slit (even stretching - which works for some and not for others).Only in the US, Canada, Oz and of course, your dear merry old England. Everywhere else, stretching works!
>>And finally to AJ, in your opinion is stretching sometimes the better alternative to circumsiosn
>It depends.Yes, it depends upon the intelligence of the stretcher!
Stretching, of course, is a far more desirable in the sense that you don't have to go for surgery, suffer the embarrassment of examination, etc. However, there's a huge difference between lengthening the foreskin and stretching phimosis.
Yes, one is sideways, and one is lengthwise. Same principle applies either way!
The desired results of functionality from stretching run from no change to full retraction with the possible reversion to prior state after a while, to bizarre extremes of just making a longer foreskin (like people that "restore" have). It is inaccurate and often unhealthy* for unqualified individuals
Unqualified? Are you qualified even to lead in silent prayer? You have the nerve to create a website which you want people to believe, yet when others are getting results, you criticize them.
to suggest that they are better versed in suggesting "cures" for these conditions.
>*See Jim's suggestion that someone should shove a filed bottle-top, pen lid, something a kid made in a workshop down their foreskin - hardly common sense and dangerous.Could you please explain to the world how such practice could be harmful? Did you mean it is harmful to the doctor's income? You never have explained that. Is is because you know it's specualtion? Shame on you boy!