[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ralesk at 03 Aug 2002 01:37:05: Re: The pros in here
As an answer to: Re: The pros in here written by GW at 02 Aug 2002 20:14:55:
I do like the last line :]
Well indeed, they were cut at birth. I wouldn't, however, call it a fetish, to recover at least a part of the original functionality.
They both, but Jim for sure, work at a place which helps other people in their restoration (was it NORM?)... So as far as skin stretching goes, Jim for sure knows a lot. Paul B., to my experience, having read his posts, and not caring what he states about himself (not doubting it, either, but that doesn't count, it's MY thing if I believe he is a doctor), so Paul B., to my experience, knows a LOT, and seems he has a huge lexical knowledge about different things, may it be cremes, infections or, say, stretching itself.>I doubt it jake my guess is they were circed at birth and as a result have developed a fetish for stretching their remaining skin and saving the world from the dreaded surgeons knife!!! not a bad thing that of course IF you dont need it.
>Im not pro circ and im not anti circ im all for whats good for the individual.
>getting on with a healthy sex life is what is important to young men and if you dont have a cock that works then lets face it your fucked and its gonna screw up what is essentially the greatest time of your life and inhibit your ability to start and maintain relationships,The guys here talk sense about stretching and i dont doubt for a minute that it does work and i think that everyone should try this first but lets face it the consensus here is that if its tight stretch it and it will work,that i know from personal expierience is not always the case.
>So to get to the point of your question no i dont think they ever have had phimosis or any other affliction with their cocks.
>I could be wrong of course so lets hear it.
>And before you all throw your toys out of your prams im not AJ and im not saying go and get your dick cut up if its foreskins too tight!!!