[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re:

Written by Ralesk at 27 Aug 2002 22:22:32:

As an answer to: Jim the racist? written by AJ at 27 Aug 2002 14:39:36:

>Exactly, Ralesk. I know from previous posts that Jim has issues with people that are Jewish. However, his comments are completely out of line and offensive. Be it religious or racial motivations that make Jim make such a digusting statement is no excuse, but a more detailed explaination of who he has "damned to hell" (doesn't the Bible say something about that too?) would be helpful in clarifying his stance - is it aimed just at moholets or Jews as a whole?

You misunderstood me, in my opinion.

The word you always used against us, is "speculation". You use it when we mentioned something about you for which you have not given enough evidence (at least in your opinion there wasn't enough evidence for it or it wasn't obvious enough).
There is no true evidence on the Jim is racist. Neither that if he is generally anti-semite. I have said what I know about the topic, and I said, read again. Obviously, you haven't. There is this woman -- no matter what "race" or "subspecies" she is from -- who is eventually BANISHING PEOPLE TO HELL (in our case some Jews). Even if she is of same origins, shouldn't she be called a ruthless antisemite? Why you have to pick on Jim? Go and pick on that woman too if you really want to pick on people! Just a sidenote, Adolf Hitler happened to have Jew relatives. And he was antisemite.

Question: are you picking on Jim because you're a racist? An anti-anticirc? Because you are indeed the latter. And you act like a proper racist on the case...

--
R.

PS: stop putting speculative bullshit about Jim in the subject lines. Thanks.


Answers: