[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Dr. Brian Morris at 30 Aug 2002 16:32:58: Anti-circumcision lobby groups
Anti-circumcision lobby groups
In a letter written by Dr Schoen to Dr Terry Russell in Brisbane in 1994 Schoen derides an organization known as 'NOCIRC' for their use of 'distortions, anecdotes and testimonials to try to influence professional and legislative bodies and the public, stating that in the past few years they have become increasingly desperate and outrageous as the medical literature has documented the benefits. For example they have compared circumcision with female genital mutilation, which is equivalent to cutting off the penis. In 1993 the rate of circumcision had risen to 80% in the USA and Schoen suggests that 'Perhaps NOCIRC has decided to export their "message" to Australia since their efforts are proving increasingly futile in the US'. One only has to do a search on the World Wide Web to read the statements from this group and others like it and any intelligent person can quickly make up their own mind about the quality of their material and the message they are trying to promulgate. Some of these people mean well and some are intelligent, but lack a broad perspective. Dr Schoen also noted that when Chairman of the Task Force his committee was bombarded with inaccurate and misleading communications from this group. They even publish their own journals, e.g. 'Cicumcision'. Another of these groups is 'UNCIRC', which promotes procedures to reverse circumcision, by, for example, stretching the loose skin on the shaft of the retracted penis or the use of surgery. This has led to genital mutilation [88]. Claimed benefits of 'increased sensitivity' in reality appear to be a result of the friction of the foreskin, whether intact or newly created, on the moist or sweaty glans and undersurface of the prepuce in the unaroused state and would obviously in the 're-uncircumcised' penis have nothing to do with an increase in touch receptors. Indeed, nerves do not regenerate. Moreover, the sensitivity during sexual intercourse is in fact identicle, according to men circumcised as adults.
- Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups Rood 8/31/2002 06:54 (0)
- My, My! Phillip 8/30/2002 22:53 (0)
- Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups Ralesk 8/30/2002 19:24 (9)
- Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups Jim 8/30/2002 20:12 (8)
- Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups Paul B. 8/31/2002 00:15 (7)
- Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups Jim 8/31/2002 00:22 (6)
- Python-esque Paul B. 8/31/2002 10:49 (5)
- Re: Python-esque Rood 9/03/2002 03:32 (4)
- Python-esqueapades Paul B. 9/03/2002 14:30 (3)
- Re: Python-esqueapades Rood 9/06/2002 10:00 (1)
- Re: Python-esqueapades Jim 9/06/2002 17:36 (0)
- Puke, NM Jim 9/04/2002 02:49 (0)