[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Rood at 31 Aug 2002 06:54:29: Re: Anti-circumcision lobby groups
As an answer to: Anti-circumcision lobby groups written by Dr. Brian Morris at 30 Aug 2002 16:32:58:
NOCIRC, The National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, is a worldwide organization devoted to ending the routine genital mutilation of helpless infants through education. It has representation in many countries of the world, nearly every large city of the United States and observer status at the United Nations.
What you and your circ fiends have is an obsessive erotica, focused upon the male penis, mutilated. It is a sickness.
>Anti-circumcision lobby groups
>In a letter written by Dr Schoen to Dr Terry Russell in Brisbane in 1994 Schoen derides an organization known as 'NOCIRC' for their use of 'distortions, anecdotes and testimonials to try to influence professional and legislative bodies and the public, stating that in the past few years they have become increasingly desperate and outrageous as the medical literature has documented the benefits. For example they have compared circumcision with female genital mutilation, which is equivalent to cutting off the penis. In 1993 the rate of circumcision had risen to 80% in the USA and Schoen suggests that 'Perhaps NOCIRC has decided to export their "message" to Australia since their efforts are proving increasingly futile in the US'. One only has to do a search on the World Wide Web to read the statements from this group and others like it and any intelligent person can quickly make up their own mind about the quality of their material and the message they are trying to promulgate. Some of these people mean well and some are intelligent, but lack a broad perspective. Dr Schoen also noted that when Chairman of the Task Force his committee was bombarded with inaccurate and misleading communications from this group. They even publish their own journals, e.g. 'Cicumcision'. Another of these groups is 'UNCIRC', which promotes procedures to reverse circumcision, by, for example, stretching the loose skin on the shaft of the retracted penis or the use of surgery. This has led to genital mutilation [88]. Claimed benefits of 'increased sensitivity' in reality appear to be a result of the friction of the foreskin, whether intact or newly created, on the moist or sweaty glans and undersurface of the prepuce in the unaroused state and would obviously in the 're-uncircumcised' penis have nothing to do with an increase in touch receptors. Indeed, nerves do not regenerate. Moreover, the sensitivity during sexual intercourse is in fact identicle, according to men circumcised as adults.