[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by nano at 09 Oct 2002 20:55:25: Re: Adhesion - Cure without surgical inervention?????
As an answer to: Re: Adhesion - Cure without surgical inervention????? written by Ralesk at 09 Oct 2002 20:43:00:
>To nano: sorry for the inconvenience and the probable misunderstandings. I know surely which posts weren't the real Jim. If you have read the board just as you say, you know which ones are fake. We'll try to help and sort out your problem. Care to explain me better how the skin is attached?
Is there any url where I can see pictures of adhesions/foreskin attached to glans? It would be a lot easier to say "mine is like this" or "not so adhered", etc.
I'm not native english speaking and I don't know enough vocabulary to explain in detail how the skin is attached. But I'll try:
If a look down at my penis with the foreskin retracted, it seems like everything is ok. I can see the glans up to the corona (is this the correct term? Where the head ends?). But if I turn the penis, the other side of the head, under the meatus, is completly covered by the foreskin. When the foreskin is retracted, the peehole faces down instead of forward.n.
- Adhesion management. Paul B. 10/09/2002 23:47 (13)
- Re: Adhesion management. nano 10/10/2002 10:59 (12)
- Good adhesion management. Paul B. 10/10/2002 12:15 (11)
- Re: Good adhesion management. nano 10/10/2002 18:20 (10)
- More good adhesion management. Paul B. 10/10/2002 19:45 (3)
- Re: More good adhesion management. nano 10/10/2002 20:06 (2)
- Well, it was a close guess! Paul B. 10/10/2002 20:23 (1)
- Re: Well, it was a close guess! nano 10/11/2002 00:54 (0)
- Re: Good adhesion management. Ralesk 10/10/2002 19:44 (3)
- Re: Good adhesion management. nano 10/10/2002 20:08 (2)
- Re: Good adhesion management. Ralesk 10/10/2002 20:22 (1)
- Re: Good adhesion management. nano 10/11/2002 00:51 (0)
- More good adhesion management. Paul B. 10/10/2002 19:41 (1)
- Premature posting. Paul B. 10/10/2002 19:48 (0)
- Re: Adhesion - Cure without surgical inervention????? Ben 10/09/2002 21:16 (0)
- Re: Perhaps just your anatomy? Ralesk 10/09/2002 21:07 (4)
- Re: Perhaps just your anatomy? nano 10/09/2002 21:20 (3)
- Re: Perhaps just your anatomy? Ralesk 10/09/2002 23:15 (2)
- Re: Perhaps just your anatomy? nano 10/10/2002 11:01 (1)
- Re: Perhaps just your anatomy? Ralesk 10/10/2002 19:46 (0)