[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Jim at 27 Oct 2002 17:56:32: Re: Get a clue, Ralesk...
As an answer to: Re: Get a clue, Ralesk... written by Ralesk at 27 Oct 2002 16:47:40:
Ral, Paul, 28/f and I are all adults who don't need an arm-chair policeman directed by a psycho to control our statements. Everyone who has tried to reason with him has concluded that there is no reasoning. Why? That's simply the nature of one who suffers with his set of symptons. Aussie Girl warned all of us, and the evidence proves her right.
Is not the purpose of this forum to offer good advice to those who need some help? Is that not being done in a manner that is bringing satisfaction to those seeking the advice? Is there any instance in which someone has suffered irreparable harm by employing the advice given? Does that not look like success in the mission? Is that success not really the bone of contention of the psycho?
- Re: Get a clue, Ralesk... 28/F 10/28/2002 03:43 (2)
- Re: Get a clue, Ralesk... Phillip 10/30/2002 02:40 (1)
- Re: Get a clue, Ralesk... Ralesk 10/30/2002 03:08 (0)