[ ARC forum 2 ]

In defense of the doctor's theories?

Written by Michael at 03 Nov 2002 19:42:56:

As an answer to: Big laugh from Guy Cox written by Rood at 03 Nov 2002 02:48:17:

> 1. To protect the glans from long spears of grass

You know,I have ALWAYS had problems with the long spears of grass getting caught in my foreskin,so I think this theorem on his part is totally erroneous! Being a jungle dweller such as myself,I would often come back to the village from my 'hunter-gatherer' activities with myriad
cross-hatchings of grass caught akimbo inside my foreskin,which caused no lack of consternation,I assure you!
The only thing that seemed to help correct this problem
was our resident shaman,who called out to the ancestors to put a shield around my genitals,which repelled the log grass so well,that I found it useful to cut through the dense underbrush in certain areas,wielding it in front of me like a scythe.
Problem is,...it made sex impossible,and even though my fellow tribesmen loved my new-found practicality on gathering missions,I had to give up the cure for more
prurient pursuits,...which by coincidence,or kismet,is the fine doctor's second postulate,below:
> 2. To facilitate quick, moist entry of the female before predators and
> enemies had an opportunity to overpower and kill them.
:)


Answers: