[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Rood at 04 Nov 2002 04:09:17: Re:
As an answer to: In defense of the doctor's theories? written by Michael at 03 Nov 2002 19:42:56:
Ah...then you have not taken advantage of the good doctor's urgent recommendation to be circumcised...so that you will be better able to adjust to sexual relations with girls. It is his considered belief that intact boys must unlearn everything from masturbation before engaging in sex with "girls", whereas a cut boy "...takes familiar stimuli to a new and higher level." Living in the 'bush', as you evidently do, you would be ignorant of these finer points of, ah, 'medicine'. Would you not? Perhaps the good doctor would go on safari to save all of us...poor misguided souls...with mass circumcisions. Forget religious conversions. After all, as he says, the idea that pain causes trauma is ridiculous. Circumcision, he insists, has a positive psychological effect from greater sexual self-confidence, knowing, as he has discovered, that we will have no problems of anxiety from a tight foreskin, such as he experienced.
Such incantations, such mumbo-jumbo, serves as intellectual "thought" on procirc internet sites. Would the fact that they have no opposition, permit no challenges to their beliefs, account for their weak minds? A lesson for us?
===============================================================================
>> 1. To protect the glans from long spears of grass
>
>You know,I have ALWAYS had problems with the long spears of grass getting caught in my foreskin,so I think this theorem on his part is totally erroneous! Being a jungle dweller such as myself,I would often come back to the village from my 'hunter-gatherer' activities with myriad
>cross-hatchings of grass caught akimbo inside my foreskin,which caused no lack of consternation,I assure you!
> The only thing that seemed to help correct this problem
>was our resident shaman,who called out to the ancestors to put a shield around my genitals,which repelled the log grass so well,that I found it useful to cut through the dense underbrush in certain areas,wielding it in front of me like a scythe.
>Problem is,...it made sex impossible,and even though my fellow tribesmen loved my new-found practicality on gathering missions,I had to give up the cure for more
>prurient pursuits,...which by coincidence,or kismet,is the fine doctor's second postulate,below:
>> 2. To facilitate quick, moist entry of the female before predators and
>> enemies had an opportunity to overpower and kill them.
>:)