ARC forum : Keeping on topic, no matter what!, Paul B. at 11/17/2002 02:59

[ ARC forum 2 ]

Keeping on topic, no matter what!
Written by Paul B. at 17 Nov 2002 02:59:08:
As an answer to: Re: Take a look at this written by Rad at 17 Nov 2002 00:38:10:
> Jim I was reading down this board and noticed you dont want to tell people about yourself and past or how you got involved in stretching other peoples foreskins. Why is that?
Because it is in fact, quite irrelevant to the matter of fixing foreskin problems. You don't need to know about Jim's background (though it is detailed quite clearly and well if you spend the time and look back through the FatherMag archives, which is what you should do if you are really concerned about this point) in order to know whether what he suggests will work. Rather, you should use two tests.
Does it make sense when you consider it carefully, in context with other things that are done to the human body by way of medical procedures?
and ...

Presuming that this whole forum, as well as FatherMag, is not just a total fabrication from end to end, then have the people who have posted here with problems, set about with stretching, and persisted with it rather than "deciding" that it was never going to work before they started; have they achieved the result they desired?

If you see that it all makes sense, then if you have a tight foreskin, you will just go and stretch it until it works properly, even if it takes months. If you choose not to see these things, then you will in that situation, most likely end up on AJ's Forum discussing pain, stitches, post-operative swelling, "over-sensitivity" and how to deal with it, "recovery" times, and other such exciting topics.
Seems like the choice is there, all laid out, and knowing Jim's personals isn't going to make a whit of difference, so it really isn't worth either Jim's or my time explaining anything about it. We are just going to keep on pulling the discussion back to the real topic (aren't we Jim? ;-).

Answers:

I do find such inquiries quite curious for this reason Jim 11/17/2002 06:20 (1)

Proof of the pudding . . . Paul B. 11/17/2002 12:42 (0)