[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Paul B. at 20 Dec 2002 19:19:18: Then from the US FDA
As an answer to: Now from the US FDA written by Will - UK at 20 Dec 2002 15:04:42:
> Interesting reading from the US FDA/ Maybe they're finally starting to get it..... http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/circumcision.html
Jim is of course correct - this is no more than a cautionary note about surgical tools, to an audience which presumably, contains a significant element too inept to even check their instruments as they use them.
The blunders that they describe, most certainly imply a degree of incompetence or recklessness that reflects on the users rather more than the instruments, but is entirely consistent with the attitude we already realise - this is a "cash cow" scam perpetrated on an populace far too ignorant to twig.
Knowing just how frequent it is to encounter a defective instrument which by rights should have been culled in the CSD, or that has been previously reported, I know only too well how routine such warnings (this one is, by the way, over two years old!) are, so the suggestion that this should in any way provoke revelation into the wisdom or indeed, otherwise, of circumcision, is really quite futile.
Perhaps you should look at it in context - look at the index page which contains that advisory, or even the CDRH site in general. How many other things are there about which to "get the message"?
- Re: Cash cow scam Rood 12/20/2002 23:08 (0)
- Re: Then from the US FDA Will - UK 12/20/2002 21:23 (8)
- Then Paul B. 12/21/2002 02:18 (5)
- More than a Little over the Top Ivan 12/21/2002 04:48 (4)
- Re: UTI's Rood 12/21/2002 15:28 (3)
- Re: UTI's Ivan 12/21/2002 17:11 (2)
- Spurious Paul B. 12/22/2002 06:53 (0)
- Re: UTI's, Penile cancer, and other justifications for circ Rood 12/22/2002 01:33 (0)
- Re: Then from the US FDA Jim 12/21/2002 00:45 (0)
- Re: Then from the US FDA Ivan 12/20/2002 23:26 (0)