[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Paul B. at 21 Dec 2002 02:18:21: Then
As an answer to: Re: Then from the US FDA written by Will - UK at 20 Dec 2002 21:23:13:
> Sorry, I'll refrain from putting anything like this up in the future. Consider me put right.
There is nothing wrong with putting up such links, and in no way was I "putting you right".
What I am saying is that you are particularly optimistic if you should see that memorandum as any admission whatsoever of remorse or realisation on the part of either the circumcision industry or the medical regulatory bodies on the ethics of circumcision.
It is all the more fascinating to see that they only consider possible mishaps as an annoyance or risk - a possible and unfortunate source of complaint.
If anything, it has the same import as a memo from Herr Goebbels to the Auschwitz administration regarding a perceived flaw in the efficacy of the gas generators.
![]()
- More than a Little over the Top Ivan 12/21/2002 04:48 (4)
- Re: UTI's Rood 12/21/2002 15:28 (3)
- Re: UTI's Ivan 12/21/2002 17:11 (2)
- Spurious Paul B. 12/22/2002 06:53 (0)
- Re: UTI's, Penile cancer, and other justifications for circ Rood 12/22/2002 01:33 (0)