[ ARC forum 2 ]
Re: How not to go about treatment.
As an answer to: Re: How not to go about treatment. written by GW at 25 Dec 2002 11:25:47:
>>>> when I'm flaccid I can retract all the way, and ... When I'm erect I can expose the head partially,
>>> Sounds like it could be frenulum breve
>>Now there's a totally out-of-touch suggestion! 
>Really!!!!!!!!! Any other breve sufferers like to comment on this?
>>He's just clearly described why it is not "fraenulum breve" - that is to say, it retracts quite fine when flaccid - and why it is a tight foreskin - the head can only be partially exposed when erect.
>>Perhaps if you were to actually learn a bit about the topic under discussion, you could then come here and provide some useful comment, instead of what you have offered up to the present? 
>>Unless this simply happens to be someone imitating the "real" GW? 
>>(Fraenulum breve is more pronounced when the penis is flaccid, since the erection is not resisting the tug from the fraenulum, and the glans is distorted more in consequence. Given that the foreskin can be retracted when flaccid, the fraenulum is not going to prevent exposure of the glans with an erection.)
>
>You are so patronising its untrue anybody who doesnt conform to your its tight stretch the forskin philosophy is a procircer or AJ.
>I suffrered from this condition and our friend here has described perfectly the same syptoms i had.
>You know as well as i do that if a frenulum is to tight it will hold the forskin forward.Im not going to suggest surgery so perhaps you might like to give me a break for once what this guy needs is to know exactly what his problem is before he can conquer it.
>Merry Christmas Doctor.
>I know why you dont like me or my belief that this 'could' be frenulum breve
>your almost a forskin facsist.
1) foreskin
2) fascist
3) calm down. Paul wasn't gnawing at your throat. Actually, you'd really need to read up on the topic and what had been posted by our sufferer.
4) that this could be fraenulum breve aka short fraenulum not only cannot be determined so surely as you claimed it to be, but mind, the poster didn't even mention that his penis would curve while pulling back, he only said that he cannot retract when erect. This, GW, would tell me he has a very light form of phimosis and probably not much more. He /might/ have a short fraenulum too (okay, he probably does, not having used his foreskin much in his life), but the main problem here is the lack of retractability, so I'd rather focus on solving his light phimosis than to drop such a frightening term like "fraenulum breve" on him, making him immediately read up on the topic on the male-initiation.net site and immediately going to a doctor to fix it as suggested. I'll believe you not wanting to push him to go to a doctor and under the knife ASAP, but actually, given a frightened, concerned person, I find it a likely reaction.
That's about all.