[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Ralesk at 02 Jan 2003 17:20:33: Re: Tight foreskin flacid or erect
As an answer to: Re: Tight foreskin flacid or erect written by Bob at 02 Jan 2003 15:51:04:
>You're asking at the wrong place. Most of the people here are against circumcison or have a foreskin fetish. You could try stretching with creme but it doesnt work all the time :o(*
To the original poster: As you see, a couple of people don't seem to know anything but to repeat badmouthing others. Look into the archives for Jake Booth's contribution about stretching his foreskin. It does sound highly dubious that a foreskin -- while often used -- would tighten up, but let's believe your story. You could start with one of the stretching methods that mose people advise of here and around other places, including even for example a French doctor called Beaugé. Now, grasp the tip of your foreskin with your fingers and pull it out forwards so that the skin tenses, but doesn't cause PAIN. Do this once or twice a day, and hold out for ten or so minutes. Experience how is it the best. After a while, add that you pull the opening of the foreskin apart with your fingers. Report back if there are any questions, and do report back with progress.
Now Bob: Who are you and why haven't I yet seen you around here? It's very interesting to call something with a natural part of the body a "fetish"... Hope you have a hair fetish and earlobe fetish and knuckle fetish too. Why would be it better if he asked a pro-circumcision place? There he would be given one option, with zero information about it, other than, "hey it's good for you, get it done". Now here, you get opinions and suggestions from all directions. Why is that a problem for you pro-circers, that he is given an option that is by far not as invasive as a circumcision, and he can try it and if he decides to fail it he can STILL freely opt for a cut? I don't understand you guys' logic that first the irreversible and then, oh yea, that's it, hope you like.
My carefully weighed two Euro-cents.
PS: most anti-circers here are firstly anti ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION, and only secondly opposing circumcision as it is. This is mostly called pro-choicism. If, though, a person with enough information that he can weigh the consequences -- and not showing sheer fetishism towards it --, decides to get cut, go and do so. The least (and most) we can try and make sure they REALLY want it or it's just a sudden whatever. It IS, afterall, irreversible, and the LEAST what we want, is that someone haunts us for not having held him back enough. And as long as he plans to leave the choice in his children's hands for themselves too, just as he himself had it, it's also okay. I can count a couple of people who had themselves done for their own "pleasure" and yet they allowed their sons to choose for themselves, and I myself have absolutely no problem with those people. It IS a totally different topic that we WILL discuss what could have made the person go as far as to cut something off of his body.
My two Euros now.