[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Rood at 21 Feb 2003 06:27:46: Circumcision "not indicated"
Found this article from Australia while investigating http://www.bmezine.com/:
It's found at: http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,5994010%255E953,00.htm on 19 Febuary 2003.
The article gives the lie to the notion that circumcision is indicated in cases of "phimosis. It suggests that 'phimosis' is usually an excuse given by doctors and parents to the insurance companies to facilitate payment for unnecessary circumcision, when the use of steroid 'creams' and stretching will accomplish a solution in 4-6 weeks time.
- Circumcision definitely "not indicated" Paul B. 2/21/2003 09:16 (0)
- Re: Circumcision "not indicated" 28/F 2/21/2003 08:19 (0)