[ ARC forum 2 ]

Ducking the question...

Written by AJ at 26 Feb 2003 22:41:59:

As an answer to: The Skater's Waltz written by Jim at 26 Feb 2003 20:21:38:

>No need to qualify anything as you know damned well exactly what I am talking about.

I think that is the general problem with you, Jim. You often just spout a lot of rubbish and then refuse to explain how you have come to the conclusions you have drawn. Why do you do that? I'd guess it is because in retrospect you are unable to qualify your comments which you have based on groundless speculations and insinuations.

>No need to answer the question either, for we already know that you have no qualms about people harming kids. Your ploys to take the focus off your problems by turning the tables and making false accusations about others isn't working.

Jim, you are the one trying to change the subject. I asked you to qualify your previous comments before we moved the conversation on to another subject.

>The pages could easily be unclogged if you'd just stay away. No need to discuss anything with you. Anyone who has ever tried has come away convinced that you are seriously nuts.

Really? Let's see...I've spoken to Ralesk quite a bit and I doubt he feels that way. I sent an e-mail to Aussie Girl once, but she responded with her usual "You are like my husband and have a personality disorder" stuff. 28/F was too intimidated to reply to an e-mail I sent her without the support of her peer group. I think that this is most likely the same reason you don't want to as well. It's not because you think I am nuts, it is because you are scared of someone rationally challenging your ideas and looking to make peace (kind of like Dubya's reluctance) yet still have different beliefs.

Turning your back on people isn't very Christian, Jim.


Answers: