[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: INTACT

Written by Piper at 27 Feb 2003 01:51:36:

As an answer to: INTACT written by Rood at 23 Feb 2003 03:52:06:

>I'm sure it's a wonderful site. Perhaps you aren't quite aware, though, that the term INTACT expresses the situation without the negative connotation of 'uncut', which implies that genital mutilation is the norm. The term 'uncut' is a terrific turnoff. It expresses a certain lack of self-respect, and kills interest. A simple change in terms will lift your site onto a higher plane.

While I agree with this, the site has been up and operating since November 1999, during which time it has propagated through various serach engines, etc.

Also, the name of the site is a derication of the South Park movie title, which was "Bigger, Longer & Uncut". Also, I'd like to add that most of the people who find my site through Google get there by answering the keywords "uncut cock" and "uncut cocks". Us people "in the know" prefer the term Intact, but the majority of people out there who are looking out of curiosity tend to still use the temd "umcut". That said, "intact" and "foreskin" are also in the site's word lists which are used by search engines.



Answers: