[ ARC forum 2 ]

You aren't getting, Jim...

Written by AJ at 28 Feb 2003 14:41:14:

As an answer to: You still don't get it, do you? written by Jim at 28 Feb 2003 14:31:14:

>People you call "Anti-circers", who would be more correctly referred to as pro-intact, are not turned on by foreskins.

That's as dumb as saying that someone like you who doesn't like Jews should correctly be referred to as pro-Christian. Besides anti-circ is not the label I'm referring to. The label in question was fetish.

>Don't judge others by your own warped feelings about body parts.

Can you qualify that statement, Jim, and explain how you have drawn this conculsion that I have warped feeling about "body parts". Or is this just another case of Jim logic (you know - if it comes from your imagination then it must be true).

Thanks.


Answers: