[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Jim at 06 Mar 2003 19:35:13: AJ, What is your problem?
As an answer to: Float that boat... written by AJ at 06 Mar 2003 19:20:18:
You seem so determined to convince these guys that they can't have success that you didn't have. All they need to do is to follow simple instructions and have some diligence. A simple-minded child could accomplish the task at hand. Is that bothering you?
Your attempts at discrediting me are an immense failure. There is nothing I've ever said on this forum or any other that cannot be backed up by research or history. Do you think playing your childish games is going to make you look like an authority on skin expansion? All of the plastic surgeons in the world and the over 20,000 men who have used the methods to restore their lost foreskins will call you a big fat liar. Have you stopped to think that every INTACT man has employed skin expansion, whether his skin is retractile or not? Take a look at an infant's penis the next time your sister or cousin changes her son. Then compare the size with your own. Is there a difference in size? How do you explain that the skin on the baby expanded to contain all of what is inside the adult penis? Now explain how EVERY single person who has ever lived has grown from a tiny ovum to whatever size he eventually became?
AJ, skin expansion is a NATURAL LAW. There is no failure in living organisms. Failure happens upon death. Shouldn't we assume that our subjects here who are asking for help are not dead? If that is the case, doesn't it follow for you that if skin expansion is a natural law, and that they have in fact employed it's techiniques in order to grow, that given the proper stimulation, that law would allow them to succeed? If you don't, perhaps you would care to tell the world why YOU ALONE would think otherwise?
- Re: AJ, What is your problem? Harmen 3/08/2003 14:20 (68)
- You are full of it Jim 3/11/2003 05:39 (0)
- Same as yours, it appears Paul B. 3/08/2003 22:47 (66)
- Re: Same as yours, it appears Harmen 3/09/2003 12:13 (65)
- In case you didn't know Jim 3/11/2003 05:42 (0)
- Missed it entirely. Paul B. 3/10/2003 12:12 (63)
- Bunch of cunts GW 3/11/2003 00:38 (25)
- Revealing Paul B. 3/11/2003 12:59 (2)
- Re: Revealing Harmen 3/12/2003 16:59 (1)
- Even more Revealing Paul B. 3/12/2003 21:02 (0)
- Re: Ralesk 3/11/2003 08:46 (6)
- To be fair, Ralesk... AJ 3/11/2003 20:33 (5)
- Re: To be fair, Ralesk... Ralesk 3/12/2003 03:12 (4)
- Faggot Grandma? AJ 3/12/2003 15:06 (3)
- Re: Faggot Grandma? Ralesk 3/12/2003 15:18 (2)
- Re: Faggot Grandma? AJ 3/12/2003 16:05 (1)
- Re: Political Correctness Ralesk 3/12/2003 22:46 (0)
- Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Jim 3/11/2003 05:56 (13)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ralesk 3/11/2003 08:57 (12)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Jim 3/12/2003 15:48 (9)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ralesk 3/12/2003 22:45 (8)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Jim 3/13/2003 06:22 (7)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ralesk 3/13/2003 07:27 (6)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Jim 3/13/2003 16:02 (5)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ralesk 3/13/2003 23:11 (4)
- Oh, I see, it's different with you Jim 3/13/2003 23:44 (1)
- Re: Oh, I see, it's different with you Aussie girl 3/14/2003 17:41 (0)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ivan 3/13/2003 23:23 (1)
- Re: Frankly, I'm glad I didn't have to face that predicament Ralesk 3/13/2003 23:24 (0)
- 17... AJ 3/11/2003 20:29 (1)
- Re: 17... Ralesk 3/12/2003 03:06 (0)
- Re: Bunch of cunts 28/F 3/11/2003 05:31 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. GW 3/11/2003 00:18 (2)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ralesk 3/11/2003 08:32 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Jim 3/11/2003 05:59 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Harmen 3/10/2003 13:57 (33)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ralesk 3/10/2003 17:15 (32)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Harmen 3/10/2003 19:09 (29)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ralesk 3/11/2003 08:28 (28)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Harmen 3/11/2003 14:24 (24)
- We don't deal with knees here Jim 3/12/2003 04:10 (4)
- Re: We don't deal with knees here Harmen 3/12/2003 20:52 (3)
- You have no credibility Jim 3/13/2003 05:43 (2)
- Re: You have no credibility Ted 3/13/2003 19:02 (1)
- Re: You have no credibility Jim 3/13/2003 19:10 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ralesk 3/12/2003 02:54 (0)
- Can't convince you, but that's not the point. Paul B. 3/11/2003 23:09 (10)
- Re: Can't convince you, but that's not the point. Harmen 3/12/2003 17:06 (9)
- Absolute bullshit Jim 3/13/2003 05:52 (8)
- Re: Proofs please Harmen 3/13/2003 10:38 (7)
- Re: Proofs please Jim 3/13/2003 16:05 (6)
- Re: A coward as well Harmen 3/13/2003 21:58 (5)
- I think you need your head examined Jim 3/14/2003 00:10 (4)
- Re: I think you need your head examined Harmen 3/14/2003 12:47 (0)
- your head examined Paul B. 3/14/2003 12:00 (2)
- Re: your head examined Jim 3/14/2003 16:42 (0)
- Re: your head examined Harmen 3/14/2003 12:52 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ivan 3/11/2003 18:38 (6)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Jim 3/13/2003 05:56 (2)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ivan 3/13/2003 20:40 (1)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Jim 3/14/2003 00:12 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Harmen 3/11/2003 21:47 (2)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ivan 3/11/2003 22:22 (1)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Ralesk 3/12/2003 03:03 (0)
- Keeps Missing Paul B. 3/11/2003 12:08 (2)
- Re: Keeps Missing Harmen 3/11/2003 14:07 (1)
- Re: Keeps Missing Jim 3/13/2003 19:14 (0)
- Re: Missed it entirely. Garivan 3/10/2003 18:15 (1)
- Waarom nederlands? Ralesk 3/11/2003 07:46 (0)