[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Common treatments...

Written by AJ at 06 Mar 2003 20:54:43:

As an answer to: Re: Common treatments... written by Ralesk at 06 Mar 2003 20:32:55:

>No, this is something that concerns forum lurkers.

I don't believe that Jim and his colleagues are qualified to offer objective medical advice nor do I believe their stance of not involving parents and the blatant disregard for the parental duty and their input is a good thing. I don't think it is appropriate for Jim to be suggesting to the naïve and children that doctors are unnecessary people to bring into the equation when discussing medical issues with the foreskin. Especially since he has his bizarre conspiracy theory. I believe it does not allow him to be objective on the matter and I don't think it allows him to have a broader perspective on this issue as a whole. So, if I feel it is necessary to demonstrate that Jim has off-wall theories about doctors and their relevance to these issues, then I'll post a link to his comments. Why? Because they clearly demonstrate that Jim does not approach legitimate medical bodies as would a normal person. Instead he approaches them as if they are objects of terror and from a stance of fear and paranoia.

>they are BOUND TO hurt themselves, so they had better chitchat with a doctor (who in the USA will have barely any idea about what a foreskin is

As discussed previously, Ralesk, I’m not convinced that you have a full understanding of what the educational process is in regards to the foreskin in the US. Anyway, that’s something we can discuss further on ICQ in the future.

Right now though, I have to be elsewhere. Speak to you later.


Answers: