[ ARC forum 2 ]

Missed it entirely.

Written by Paul B. at 10 Mar 2003 12:12:26:

As an answer to: Re: Same as yours, it appears written by Harmen at 09 Mar 2003 12:13:58:

> It was not my thesis that AJ was ALONE in his opinion! How pitiful for you to need the help of Hitler to prove your statements.

Then you missed the point entirely, didn't you? How pitiful of you to attempt to belittle a clear argument because you just can't comprehend it. The point is - it doesn't matter whether AJ has others of the same opinion, nor how many, the opinion can still be wrong, as my example shows nicely. And if it is wrong, we need to be here to point that out.

>> You are the advocate for cosmetic surgery
> No, I?m not, but I don?t mind some corrections to make a function better, to look better and to feel better.

Your words:

In the years before there was a normal use without any problems at having sexual intercourse or masturbating. This was not the principal motive for the operation. It rather was an aesthetic wish.

> The penis is an important part of a man?s body. I have seen frustrated men only because of the shape of their penis. They were ashamed for their own body. So indirectly it can be an important mental question too.

It sure can!

> Beware of the fact that walking on the street can have the same effect!

But at least walking on the street takes you somewhere. It is necessary.

> I myself prefer to keep the foreskin intact,

But to keep it pulled back, to look circumcised. Funny tyke!

> Sometimes this really helps to feel better if stretching doesn?t work enough.

There is no evidence on your site that you ever tried stretching.

> Jim says - between his blinkers - that it always helps, and so it?s your own fault if you don?t succeed. He generates feelings of guilt by serious youngsters and you do the same.

He generates elation in those who do the stretching - unlike yourself - and realise that they achieved something by their own effort.

> You preach that all you have or get is good enough for you. I don?t belong to that religion.

If what you have is perfectly functional, then yes, it is good enough, and thinking what is perfectly functional is not enough is indicative of a problem. If it is not functional, then the simplest approach to making it functional, is the best.

> Recently I had removed from my body some visible warts

So did you have the warts removed by cutting them out (leaves scars), or by cryocautery? Cryocautery is the simplest surgical means, and therefore the preferred one (though non-surgical means, such as podophyllotoxin or Imiquimod are quite effective also). That is the point. Where were they by the way?

> and unhealthy growing birth-marks.

That term is far too non-specific to even attempt to address.

> I feel better now. I really cannot see that this feeling should be wrong.

Good for you, but since your "aesthetic" tastes regarding the fraenulum are somewhat odd, to say the least, that isn't very helpful to anyone coming here with either an actual dysfunction, or anxiety about a normal feature.


Answers: