[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: circumcised

Written by william at 19 Mar 2003 12:06:40:

As an answer to: Re: circumcised written by Jim at 16 Mar 2003 16:03:37:

does NORM have a website?


>Although the loss of sensation is something that most advocates of mutilation deny, they contradict themselves when they report that their "hyper-sensitivity" disapppears within weeks of losing their protective covering.
>Your best source of understanding what kind of loss is inevitable would be the organization know as NORM. That's the worldwide group which teaches restoration. The complaint of loss of sensation is not a secret, and is very likely the number one reason that a man would undertake the lengthy process of restoration. To date, the best estimate of men who have come to grips with their condition to the point that they wish to reverse it, is about 20,000. Because of the nature of word of mouth discussions, it is impossible to know the true figure, but it is known that the number of men who have difficulty in achieving satisfactory orgasmic results number well into the millions. While no formal studies have been conducted to determine what link there might be between erectile dysfunction and the absence of the foreskin, there is certainly a good possibility of such a link when you consider the skyrocketing sales of Viagra in the US where some 65 or 70% of all adult men have no foreskin. You see, erections are not just a physical phenomenon. As the sensitivity of the denuded glans gradually disappears over the years, orgasm becomes much more difficult to achieve, causing anxiety in the victim. Eventually, the erectile process is affected through the workings of the mind which is being told by the feedback from the penis that the sexual act is futile. Then comes along the American pharmaceutical industry to the rescue with the little blue pill as a panacea. With its overwhelming success, the likelihood of ever seeing an honest inquiry into causes for ED become very slim. In case you haven't figured it out yet, money controls almost all medical research. The pharmaceutical companies own the bank, so to speak. Truth would be disastorous.
>Meanwhile, the attendance at NORM meetings continues, with new faces appearing monthly. Those faces repeatedly tell the same story of loss of sensation, and the medical industry continues to deny that such is the possibility. You can figure it out for yourself. We have the militant mutilating societies telling us of the benefits they enjoy without their foreskins, one of which is losing their "hyper-sensivity", and we have thousands of men following the directions they receive from NORM to embark on a two to ten year project of restortation in order to recapture some of their lost sensation. When you contact NORM, you'll learn that those men continue their personal projects because they are getting results; results they can feel. Now, whom will you chose to believe? You have on one hand those who contradictorily claim no change in sensation, and the mulitudes of those who will spend countless hours of tedium trying to gain back that which they claim to have lost. What does common sense tell you when you consider anatomy. In this case, parts is not parts as in KFC chicken. The parts which are removed are vitally linked to each other in the process of creating sensation to be enjoyed in sexual activities. Why would anyone wish to risk the loss of something so beautiful? You tell us.


Answers: