[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Sensation...

Written by Ralesk at 09 Apr 2003 20:53:59:

As an answer to: Re: Sensation... written by chImp at 09 Apr 2003 20:29:33:

>You're damn right. That's the major drawback of having people like Ralesk and Ivan here- THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.

When have I said anything about the sensations one has or doesn't have while phimosed? I don't remember EVER commenting on that. However I /have/ stretched my foreskin, even if not to a very big extent; so SHUT UP.

>We should only have people who share their experiences with each other, instead of people who assume consepts about various issues not based upon personal experience (hi Ralesk!). Such people are the EXACT reason why half the American males get half their dicks cut off at birth (deliberate exaggeration in order to ridicule the practise).

Uhm, well, I don't think those who oppose circumcision as a solution to phimosis could be the REASON for neonatal circumcision. Your logic is FAR off.
Actually if you would have OPENED your blind EYES, you could SEE that we are telling phimosed people that -- due to whatever reasons, probably having to do with how prudish or ignorant they were brought up -- they should follow what small children would do by INSTINCT, that is, pulling their foreskin.

>I firmly believe that John Kellogg was the 19th-century equivalent of Jim ("masturation will kill you, thus we must circumcise. why? that's just how it is").

Uhm, sorry, but Jim is NOT an anti-masturbation person. I don't think this has ANY logic in it, EITHER.


Answers: