[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by chImp at 10 Apr 2003 01:02:03: Digging in the Past: The truth about Jim
It appears to be a contradiction. The only way it can NOT be contradiction, is if Jim was circed at a later age (possibly due to phimosis). By being "a victim" he means his doctor desinformed him.
However: The second link is posted by "jim", not "Jim". The second discloses a whole lot of info, which is not typical for Jim. I came to a conclusion that the last one wasn't posted by Jim.
So:
* Jim was circed at birth
* He doesn't have a foreskin, nor did he ever have it. He gives advice about something he never posessed.
- Re: Digging in the Past: The truth about Jim Ralesk 4/10/2003 01:10 (0)
- Re: Digging in the Past: The truth about Jim 28/F 4/10/2003 01:08 (23)
- Digging2 chImp 4/10/2003 01:13 (22)
- Bill Clinton chImp 4/10/2003 01:17 (21)
- Re: Bill Clinton Harmen 4/10/2003 22:31 (19)
- Re: Bill Clinton chImp 4/11/2003 00:17 (0)
- Re: Bill Clinton Ivan 4/10/2003 23:13 (17)
- Amen! Paul B. 4/10/2003 23:36 (16)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 00:01 (15)
- Re: Amen! Ivan 4/11/2003 00:19 (14)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 00:34 (13)
- Re: Amen! Ivan 4/11/2003 01:00 (12)
- CULTURE Rood 4/11/2003 04:32 (3)
- Re: CULTURE Ivan 4/11/2003 04:41 (2)
- Re: CULTURE and the "City" Rood 4/11/2003 05:54 (1)
- Re: CULTURE and the "City" Ivan 4/11/2003 08:16 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 02:19 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 02:13 (6)
- Re: Amen! Ralesk 4/11/2003 12:25 (3)
- Re: What's in a name? Ivan 4/11/2003 17:40 (1)
- Re: What's in a name? Ralesk 4/11/2003 18:58 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 15:45 (0)
- Re: Amen! mike 4/11/2003 09:26 (0)
- Re: Amen! mike 4/11/2003 09:23 (0)
- Re: Bill Clinton Ivan 4/10/2003 01:24 (0)