[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by Harmen at 10 Apr 2003 22:31:41: Re: Bill Clinton
As an answer to: Bill Clinton written by chImp at 10 Apr 2003 01:17:40:
>>The whacky part of Jim's statement was that he took it for granted that people who voted for Clinton were idiots.
Before I objected to Jim’s advices for not always being shaded enough. I didn’t dig in his past, but if it’s true, I must confess that his feelings about Clinton and his frankly admitting to be a Christian are facts that are in his credit. Clinton indeed was a Lewinsky fucking president and a great liar. Those were his qualities!
There are Christians with a rather rigid vision on evolution. I don’t agree with them, but it’s not very relevant on foreskin issues. Why don’t you attack Jim on his advices?
- Re: Bill Clinton chImp 4/11/2003 00:17 (0)
- Re: Bill Clinton Ivan 4/10/2003 23:13 (17)
- Amen! Paul B. 4/10/2003 23:36 (16)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 00:01 (15)
- Re: Amen! Ivan 4/11/2003 00:19 (14)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 00:34 (13)
- Re: Amen! Ivan 4/11/2003 01:00 (12)
- CULTURE Rood 4/11/2003 04:32 (3)
- Re: CULTURE Ivan 4/11/2003 04:41 (2)
- Re: CULTURE and the "City" Rood 4/11/2003 05:54 (1)
- Re: CULTURE and the "City" Ivan 4/11/2003 08:16 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 02:19 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 02:13 (6)
- Re: Amen! Ralesk 4/11/2003 12:25 (3)
- Re: What's in a name? Ivan 4/11/2003 17:40 (1)
- Re: What's in a name? Ralesk 4/11/2003 18:58 (0)
- Re: Amen! chImp 4/11/2003 15:45 (0)
- Re: Amen! mike 4/11/2003 09:26 (0)
- Re: Amen! mike 4/11/2003 09:23 (0)