[ ARC forum 2 ]

Digging in the Past: the truth about AJ

Written by chImp at 16 Apr 2003 00:38:25:

Sometimes other people than Jim make weird statements...here's one....from my buddy AJ!!! (no offence AJ, I'm just surfing in the archives)

...

Here's what I object to:

"Interesting speculation, Paul. Are you circumcised or just going by what you have been told? Besides, pleasure is pretty subjective and plenty of objective studies don’t back up your presumption, though perhaps a few do – albeit from oft-questionable resource i.e. anti-circ sites etc. Anyway, just being picky there...let's move on..."

The thing is that, there ARE no anti-circ sites (to the best of my knowledge) ! The definition of such a site would be that any opinion that would favour circumcision would lead to a ban of the participant. However, there ARE pro-circ sites such as Circlist, where they don't tolerate free opinions. Anti-circers don't have to restrict their participants, because the only logical conclusion of their discussions would be that circumcision diminishes sexual pleasure (in comparison with a normal, intact male with no tight foreskin) and that RIC is child abuse.


Answers: