[ ARC forum 2 ]

Re: Standards...

Written by AJ at 25 Apr 2003 22:19:57:

As an answer to: Re: Standards... written by 28/F at 25 Apr 2003 21:19:49:

>Let's again point out that YOU are the one mentioning this method, as always.

Acutally, 28/F, it is your anti-circumcision pals that have promoted such methods. See here and here for abundant instances of such demonstrations and suggestions.

---

---

Answers:

• Re: Standards... Ivan 4/25/2003 22:43 (19)
  • Re: Standards... chImp 4/26/2003 00:38 (18)
    • Re: Standards... Ivan 4/26/2003 00:46 (17)
      • Re: Standards... c 4/26/2003 01:04 (16)
        • Re: Standards... Jim 4/26/2003 05:05 (14)
          • Re: Standards... c 4/26/2003 16:48 (13)
            • Re: Standards... Willie 4/28/2003 19:58 (12)
              • Re: Standards... chImp 4/28/2003 20:23 (11)
                • Standing and Reclining Standards... Rood 4/29/2003 01:00 (2)
                  • Re: Standing and Reclining Standards... chImp 4/29/2003 01:50 (1)
                    • Professional Standards... Rood 4/29/2003 02:30 (0)
                • Re: Standards... Ivan 4/28/2003 20:57 (7)
                  • Capabilities Paul B. 4/29/2003 01:02 (2)
                    • Re: Oh-Oh I can see it coming! Ivan 4/29/2003 01:16 (1)
                      • LOL!!!!!!!!! Jim 4/29/2003 01:29 (0)
                  • A question to Rood chImp 4/29/2003 00:14 (3)
                    • Re: A question to Rood Aussie girl 5/02/2003 21:41 (0)
                    • Answered above: See Standing/Reclining & Professional Standard posts Rood 4/30/2003 04:15 (0)
                    • Re: A question to Rood Ralesk 4/29/2003 13:53 (0)
        • Re: Standards... Ivan 4/26/2003 01:16 (0)