[ ARC forum 2 ]
Written by chImp at 30 Apr 2003 18:45:01: Re: circumcision myth exposed!
As an answer to: Re: circumcision myth exposed! written by Ivan at 30 Apr 2003 16:34:51:
This will go down in my list of 10 most stupid statements from ARC2.
What you are saying here is that EVEN if a test shows that the glans sensitivity is the same for intact and circed adults, you STILL will disregard it, by blaming everything on porn and sex and "unusual" masturbation techniques. Those things are among the NORMAL and EXPECTED behaviour of men in our society. Basically, what you are suggesting is that keeping the foreskin is not enough: we should also keep the tiger in the cage most of the time.
>Another problem is if they used American intact men as test subjects who ahd been largely surrounded their whole lives by circumcised men - in making comparisons, viewing porn, comparing masturbation techniques, having intercourse with women unfamiliar with intact penises, the men would have had their penises subjected to much rougher handling than an intact man normally would 'on his own.' Again, this would toughen up his glans and minimize the differences. Comparison would best be made to intact men from a non-circumcising society, such as most of Europe.
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! Ralesk 5/01/2003 04:50 (0)
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! Mike 4/30/2003 20:32 (0)
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! Ivan 4/30/2003 19:04 (3)
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! chImp 4/30/2003 19:08 (2)
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! Ralesk 5/01/2003 04:53 (0)
- Re: circumcision myth exposed! Mike 4/30/2003 20:34 (0)